HOTELS. HOTELS.
THESE HOTELS.
THESE DISHES HOTELS.
THESE DISHES WILL HOTELS.
THESE DISHES WILL BE HOTELS.
THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED HOTELS.
THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY HOTELS.
THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A HOTELS.
THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A GREEN HOTELS.
THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A GREEN LEAF THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A GREEN LEAF THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A GREEN LEAF
ICON THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A GREEN LEAF
ICON ON THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A GREEN LEAF
ICON ON THE THESE DISHES WILL BE
IDENTIFIED BY A GREEN LEAF
ICON ON THE MENUS.>>>>>>AND>>>AND A>>>AND A LOT>>>AND A LOT OF>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP>>>AND A LOT OF PEOPLE
WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN
THE WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN
THE AIR WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN
THE AIR AS WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN
THE AIR AS WE’VE WATCHING THIS STORY CLOSELY,
THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN
THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN
THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN THE FUTURE OF PG&E IS UP IN
THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN
REPORTING. THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN
REPORTING. THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN
REPORTING.
AND THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN
REPORTING.
AND A THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN
REPORTING.
AND A HEARING THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN
REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN
REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH THE AIR AS WE’VE BEEN
REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR TURNING REPORTING.
AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT. AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT. AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU WERE AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU WERE IN AND A HEARING NEXT MONTH COULD
BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN
FRANCISCO BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN
FRANCISCO AT BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN
FRANCISCO AT THE BE A MAJOR TURNING POINT.
BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN
FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN
FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN
FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST
MEETING BECCA, YOU WERE IN SAN
FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST
MEETING TODAY. FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST
MEETING TODAY. FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST
MEETING TODAY.
BRING FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST
MEETING TODAY.
BRING US FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST
MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST
MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP TO FRANCISCO AT THE LATEST
MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP TO SPEED. MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP TO SPEED. MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, TODAY MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, TODAY IN MEETING TODAY.
BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY COURT BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY COURT WE BRING US UP TO SPEED.
>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2>>YES, TODAY IN FEDERAL
BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING
PLANS BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING
PLANS TO BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING
PLANS TO GET BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING
PLANS TO GET PG&E BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING
PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT BANKRUPTCY COURT WE HEARD
DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING
PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING
PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF DISCUSSIONS ON 2 COMPETING
PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF
BANKRUPTCY. PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF
BANKRUPTCY. PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF
BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF
BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF
BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF
BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY PLANS TO GET PG&E OUT OF
BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, AND BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, AND BY BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, AND BY LAW BANKRUPTCY.
EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE
COMPANY EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE
COMPANY THAT EARLIER THIS MONTH THEY FILED
THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE
COMPANY THAT DECLARES THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE
COMPANY THAT DECLARES THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE
COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE
COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE
COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE THE PLAN, AND BY LAW THE
COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING OUT, COMPANY THAT DECLARES
BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE WAS BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE WAS A BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE WAS A COMPETING BANKRUPTCY GETS THE FIRST
CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM ANOTHER CRACK AT GETTING OUT, BUT
THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM ANOTHER GROUP. THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM ANOTHER GROUP. THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THE THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE THERE WAS A COMPETING PLAN
FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR PLAN FROM ANOTHER GROUP.
THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE THEY ARGUED THE JUDGE SHOULD
CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 INSTEAD CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 INSTEAD OF CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING CONSIDER THEIR PLAN ALONGSIDE
PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING PG&E PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING PG&E PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING PG&E
FIRST PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING PG&E
FIRST IN PG&E’S PLAN AND DECIDE BETWEEN
THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING PG&E
FIRST IN LINE. THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING PG&E
FIRST IN LINE. THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING PG&E
FIRST IN LINE.
>>THE 2 INSTEAD OF GETTING PG&E
FIRST IN LINE.
>>RIGHT. FIRST IN LINE.
>>RIGHT. FIRST IN LINE.
>>RIGHT.
>>FIRST IN LINE.
>>RIGHT.
>>ATTORNEYS FIRST IN LINE.
>>RIGHT.
>>ATTORNEYS FOR FIRST IN LINE.
>>RIGHT.
>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE>>RIGHT.
>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE>>RIGHT.
>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE
VICTIMS>>RIGHT.
>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE
VICTIMS SUPPORT>>RIGHT.
>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE
VICTIMS SUPPORT THE>>RIGHT.
>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE
VICTIMS SUPPORT THE NEW>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE
VICTIMS SUPPORT THE NEW>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE
VICTIMS SUPPORT THE NEW
COMPETING>>ATTORNEYS FOR WILDFIRE
VICTIMS SUPPORT THE NEW
COMPETING PLAN. VICTIMS SUPPORT THE NEW
COMPETING PLAN. VICTIMS SUPPORT THE NEW
COMPETING PLAN.
THE VICTIMS SUPPORT THE NEW
COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS SUPPORT THE NEW
COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’ COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’ COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN COMPETING PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS THE WILDFIRE VICTIMS’
ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD GIVE ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD GIVE THE ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING ATTORNEYS SAY THE NEW PLAN HAS
MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF MORE MONEY FOR VICTIMS AND
WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF PG&E. WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF PG&E. WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO WOULD GIVE THE COMPETING GROUP
CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND THEY CONTROL OF PG&E.
>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED,>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST IN>>THEY WOULD BEGIN TO RUN
THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THEIR THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THEIR PLAN THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THEIR PLAN THAT THIS COMPANY AND THEY HAVE
INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THEIR PLAN THAT THEY’RE INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THEIR PLAN THAT THEY’RE INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THEIR PLAN THAT THEY’RE
WILLING INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THEIR PLAN THAT THEY’RE
WILLING TO INDICATED, AT LEAST IN TERMS
OF THEIR PLAN THAT THEY’RE
WILLING TO RESTRUCTURE OF THEIR PLAN THAT THEY’RE
WILLING TO RESTRUCTURE OF THEIR PLAN THAT THEY’RE
WILLING TO RESTRUCTURE
CORPORATE OF THEIR PLAN THAT THEY’RE
WILLING TO RESTRUCTURE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, WILLING TO RESTRUCTURE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, WILLING TO RESTRUCTURE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
RESTRUCTURE WILLING TO RESTRUCTURE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
RESTRUCTURE AND WILLING TO RESTRUCTURE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
RESTRUCTURE AND PUT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
RESTRUCTURE AND PUT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED PEOPLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED RESTRUCTURE AND PUT
EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES
BEFORE EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES
BEFORE TO EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES
BEFORE TO GET EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES
BEFORE TO GET THIS EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES
BEFORE TO GET THIS COMPANY EXPERIENCED PEOPLE IN PLACE
THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES
BEFORE TO GET THIS COMPANY RUN THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES
BEFORE TO GET THIS COMPANY RUN THAT HAVE MANAGED UTILITIES
BEFORE TO GET THIS COMPANY RUN
RIGHT.>>>>WE’LL>>WE’LL SEE>>WE’LL SEE HOW>>WE’LL SEE HOW THE>>WE’LL SEE HOW THE
CONVERSATION>>WE’LL SEE HOW THE
CONVERSATION GOES.>>WE’LL SEE HOW THE
CONVERSATION GOES.
THE>>WE’LL SEE HOW THE
CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL>>WE’LL SEE HOW THE
CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE>>WE’LL SEE HOW THE
CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH>>WE’LL SEE HOW THE
CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY THE CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY THE ONE CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT CONVERSATION GOES.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A THE FEDERAL JUDGE THOUGH IS
ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN. ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN. ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT ULTIMATELY THE ONE THAT WILL
APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT APPROVE A PLAN.
FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH THE FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH THE PLAN FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH THE PLAN THAT’S FOR ITS PART PG&E SAYS IT WILL
OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS OPPOSE ANY PLAN THAT COMPETE
WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS MONTH. WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS MONTH. WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE SAID WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE SAID THAT WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT WITH THE PLAN THAT’S SUBMITTED
EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR OCTOBER EARLIER THIS MONTH.
A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR OCTOBER 7th. A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR OCTOBER 7th. A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD BE A JUDGE SAID THAT COURT DATE
FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH FOR OCTOBER 7th.
SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SO IT SHOULD BE REALLY
INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E INTERESTING TO HEAR BOTH SIDES
ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD ARGUE WHETHER THE PLAN SHOULD
BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST CRACK BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST CRACK AND BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE BE COMPETING OR AS PG&E WILL
ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT
JUST ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT
JUST FOR ARGUE WHETHER THEY SHOULD HAVE
THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT
JUST FOR THEM. THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT
JUST FOR THEM. THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT
JUST FOR THEM.
>>THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT
JUST FOR THEM.
>>RIGHT, THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT
JUST FOR THEM.
>>RIGHT, WE’LL THAT FIRST CRACK AND HAVE IT
JUST FOR THEM.
>>RIGHT, WE’LL DEFINITELY JUST FOR THEM.
>>RIGHT, WE’LL DEFINITELY JUST FOR THEM.
>>RIGHT, WE’LL DEFINITELY
WATCH